[llvm] [nfc][InstrProfTest]Parameterize the edge cases of value profile merge by value kind (PR #73165)
Mingming Liu via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 22 12:12:57 PST 2023
https://github.com/minglotus-6 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73165
There are three test cases to test the merge of value profiles. 'get_icall_data_merge1' tests the basic case; {get_icall_data_merge1_saturation, get_icall_data_merge_site_trunc} tests the edge case.
This patch parameterizes the edge case test coverage by value kind and adds the coverage of 'IPVK_MemOPSize'. Keep the basic test structure as it is. The main reason is test data construction and test assertions is clearer for each kind in the basic test.
>From 69c678fcce4ba7a9f2561c4a8f7d7ea9bbbe3338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mingming Liu <mingmingl at google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:05:19 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [nfc][InstrProfTest]Parameterize the edge cases of value
profile merge by value kind
---
llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp | 78 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
index 875e2d06d839367..e6613a90dc7c53e 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ProfileData/InstrProfTest.cpp
@@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, annotate_vp_data) {
ASSERT_EQ(1U, ValueData[3].Count);
}
-TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1) {
+TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, icall_data_merge) {
static const char caller[] = "caller";
NamedInstrProfRecord Record11(caller, 0x1234, {1, 2});
NamedInstrProfRecord Record12(caller, 0x1234, {1, 2});
@@ -920,8 +920,18 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1) {
ASSERT_EQ(2U, VD_4[2].Count);
}
-TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1_saturation) {
+struct ValueProfileMergeEdgeCaseTest
+ : public InstrProfTest,
+ public ::testing::WithParamInterface<std::tuple<bool, uint32_t>> {
+ void SetUp() override { Writer.setOutputSparse(std::get<0>(GetParam())); }
+
+ uint32_t getValueProfileKind() const { return std::get<1>(GetParam()); }
+};
+
+TEST_P(ValueProfileMergeEdgeCaseTest, value_profile_data_merge_saturation) {
+ const uint32_t ValueKind = getValueProfileKind();
static const char bar[] = "bar";
+ const uint64_t ProfiledValue = 0x5678;
const uint64_t MaxValCount = std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max();
const uint64_t MaxEdgeCount = getInstrMaxCountValue();
@@ -944,18 +954,18 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1_saturation) {
ASSERT_EQ(Result, instrprof_error::success);
NamedInstrProfRecord Record4("baz", 0x5678, {3, 4});
- Record4.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1);
- InstrProfValueData VD4[] = {{uint64_t(bar), 1}};
- Record4.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD4, 1, nullptr);
+ Record4.reserveSites(ValueKind, 1);
+ InstrProfValueData VD4[] = {{ProfiledValue, 1}};
+ Record4.addValueData(ValueKind, 0, VD4, 1, nullptr);
Result = instrprof_error::success;
Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record4), Err);
ASSERT_EQ(Result, instrprof_error::success);
// Verify value data counter overflow.
NamedInstrProfRecord Record5("baz", 0x5678, {5, 6});
- Record5.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1);
- InstrProfValueData VD5[] = {{uint64_t(bar), MaxValCount}};
- Record5.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD5, 1, nullptr);
+ Record5.reserveSites(ValueKind, 1);
+ InstrProfValueData VD5[] = {{ProfiledValue, MaxValCount}};
+ Record5.addValueData(ValueKind, 0, VD5, 1, nullptr);
Result = instrprof_error::success;
Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record5), Err);
ASSERT_EQ(Result, instrprof_error::counter_overflow);
@@ -966,48 +976,48 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge1_saturation) {
// Verify saturation of counts.
Expected<InstrProfRecord> ReadRecord1 =
Reader->getInstrProfRecord("foo", 0x1234);
- EXPECT_THAT_ERROR(ReadRecord1.takeError(), Succeeded());
- ASSERT_EQ(MaxEdgeCount, ReadRecord1->Counts[0]);
+ ASSERT_THAT_ERROR(ReadRecord1.takeError(), Succeeded());
+ EXPECT_EQ(MaxEdgeCount, ReadRecord1->Counts[0]);
Expected<InstrProfRecord> ReadRecord2 =
Reader->getInstrProfRecord("baz", 0x5678);
ASSERT_TRUE(bool(ReadRecord2));
- ASSERT_EQ(1U, ReadRecord2->getNumValueSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, ReadRecord2->getNumValueSites(ValueKind));
std::unique_ptr<InstrProfValueData[]> VD =
- ReadRecord2->getValueForSite(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0);
- ASSERT_EQ(StringRef("bar"), StringRef((const char *)VD[0].Value, 3));
- ASSERT_EQ(MaxValCount, VD[0].Count);
+ ReadRecord2->getValueForSite(ValueKind, 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ProfiledValue, VD[0].Value);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MaxValCount, VD[0].Count);
}
-// This test tests that when there are too many values
-// for a given site, the merged results are properly
-// truncated.
-TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge_site_trunc) {
+// This test tests that when there are too many values for a given site, the
+// merged results are properly truncated.
+TEST_P(ValueProfileMergeEdgeCaseTest, value_profile_data_merge_site_trunc) {
+ const uint32_t ValueKind = getValueProfileKind();
static const char caller[] = "caller";
NamedInstrProfRecord Record11(caller, 0x1234, {1, 2});
NamedInstrProfRecord Record12(caller, 0x1234, {1, 2});
// 2 value sites.
- Record11.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 2);
+ Record11.reserveSites(ValueKind, 2);
InstrProfValueData VD0[255];
for (int I = 0; I < 255; I++) {
VD0[I].Value = 2 * I;
VD0[I].Count = 2 * I + 1000;
}
- Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD0, 255, nullptr);
- Record11.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
+ Record11.addValueData(ValueKind, 0, VD0, 255, nullptr);
+ Record11.addValueData(ValueKind, 1, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
- Record12.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 2);
+ Record12.reserveSites(ValueKind, 2);
InstrProfValueData VD1[255];
for (int I = 0; I < 255; I++) {
VD1[I].Value = 2 * I + 1;
VD1[I].Count = 2 * I + 1001;
}
- Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0, VD1, 255, nullptr);
- Record12.addValueData(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 1, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
+ Record12.addValueData(ValueKind, 0, VD1, 255, nullptr);
+ Record12.addValueData(ValueKind, 1, nullptr, 0, nullptr);
Writer.addRecord(std::move(Record11), Err);
// Merge profile data.
@@ -1017,17 +1027,23 @@ TEST_P(MaybeSparseInstrProfTest, get_icall_data_merge_site_trunc) {
readProfile(std::move(Profile));
Expected<InstrProfRecord> R = Reader->getInstrProfRecord("caller", 0x1234);
- EXPECT_THAT_ERROR(R.takeError(), Succeeded());
- std::unique_ptr<InstrProfValueData[]> VD(
- R->getValueForSite(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0));
- ASSERT_EQ(2U, R->getNumValueSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget));
- ASSERT_EQ(255U, R->getNumValueDataForSite(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 0));
+ ASSERT_THAT_ERROR(R.takeError(), Succeeded());
+ std::unique_ptr<InstrProfValueData[]> VD(R->getValueForSite(ValueKind, 0));
+ ASSERT_EQ(2U, R->getNumValueSites(ValueKind));
+ EXPECT_EQ(255U, R->getNumValueDataForSite(ValueKind, 0));
for (unsigned I = 0; I < 255; I++) {
- ASSERT_EQ(VD[I].Value, 509 - I);
- ASSERT_EQ(VD[I].Count, 1509 - I);
+ EXPECT_EQ(VD[I].Value, 509 - I);
+ EXPECT_EQ(VD[I].Count, 1509 - I);
}
}
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(
+ EdgeCaseTest, ValueProfileMergeEdgeCaseTest,
+ ::testing::Combine(::testing::Bool(), /* Sparse */
+ ::testing::Values(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget,
+ IPVK_MemOPSize) /* ValueKind */
+ ));
+
static void addValueProfData(InstrProfRecord &Record) {
Record.reserveSites(IPVK_IndirectCallTarget, 5);
InstrProfValueData VD0[] = {{uint64_t(callee1), 400},
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list