[llvm] [BOLT] Support instrumentation hook via DT_FINI_ARRAY (PR #67348)

[Vladislav Khmelevsky via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1276,6 +1280,60 @@ void RewriteInstance::discoverFileObjects() {
   registerFragments();
 }
 
+Error RewriteInstance::discoverFiniAddress() {
+  // If FiniFunctionAddress is already set, we got if from DT_FINI. We use
+  // DT_FINI instead of DT_FINI_ARRAY if it's available.
+  if (BC->FiniFunctionAddress)
+    return Error::success();
+
+  if (BC->IsStaticExecutable)
+    return Error::success();
+
+  if (!BC->FiniArrayAddress || !BC->FiniArraySize) {
+    return createStringError(
+        std::errc::not_supported,
+        "Instrumentation needs either DT_FINI or DT_FINI_ARRAY");
+  }
+
+  if (*BC->FiniArraySize < BC->AsmInfo->getCodePointerSize()) {
+    return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
+                             "Need at least 1 DT_FINI_ARRAY slot");
+  }
+
+  ErrorOr<BinarySection &> FiniArraySection =
+      BC->getSectionForAddress(*BC->FiniArrayAddress);
+  if (auto EC = FiniArraySection.getError())
+    return errorCodeToError(EC);
+
+  BC->FiniArraySection = &*FiniArraySection;
+  const Relocation *FiniFunctionReloc =
+      FiniArraySection->getDynamicRelocationAt(0);
+
+  if (!FiniFunctionReloc) {
+    return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
----------------
yota9 wrote:

As I understand we're looking for the RELATIVE relocation here. But non-pie binaries won't have one, all we need is emit the right address at the array, so editing static relocations (since instrumentation doesn't support binaries without ones) would be good enough?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67348