[PATCH] D152411: [RISCV] Fix crash in lowerVECTOR_INTERLEAVE when VecVT is an LMUL=8 type.

Yeting Kuo via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 7 20:15:38 PDT 2023


fakepaper56 added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp:7697
 
+  // If the VT is LMUL=8, we need to split and reassemble.
+  if (VecVT.getSizeInBits().getKnownMinValue() == (8 * RISCV::RVVBitsPerBlock)) {
----------------
craig.topper wrote:
> fakepaper56 wrote:
> > Whist is the reason that we don't expand LMUL=8 VECTOR_INTERLEAVE? I think `DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_VECTOR_DEINTERLEAVE` does the same job.
> The ISD::VECTOR_INTERLEAVE node takes 2 inputs and produces 2 results with the same number of elements. This is different than IR where it's 2 inputs and 1 result with 2 twice as many elements.
> 
> The test cases that crash started in IR as interleaving 2 MUL=8 types to produce a LMUL=16 result. In SelectionDAG this is represented as 2 LMUL=8 inputs and 2 LMUL=8 outputs. Type legalization only sees the LMUL=8 types so all the types looks legal.
> 
> The RISC-V lowering code concatenates the 2 LMUL=8 values into an LMUL=16 type which crashes because that isn't a legal type.
> 
> This patch splits the inputs into LMUL=4 pieces and creates to INTERLEAVE operations. When each of the INTERLEAVE operations is then lowered the concatenation will only produce an LMUL=8 type.
Thank you. I misunderstood this. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D152411/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D152411



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list