[PATCH] D150605: LLT: Add some stub constructors for FP types

[Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

arsenm added a comment.

In D150605#4343994 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150605#4343994>, @aemerson wrote:

> Did we decide on different types as the route for this? I'm still wondering if somehow adding more semantic operands to FP operations would be less intrusive.

I thought previous discussions on this were coalescing around adding something to LLT, but not the details of how that would look. My feeling is adding FP semantics to the operations would require more code on average, plus additional costs from operating differently from the high level IR


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150605/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150605