[PATCH] D96928: [LICM][Coroutine] Don't sink stores from loops with coro.suspend instructions

[Xun Li via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

lxfind added a comment.

> Yes, lots of the cases follow this rules. However, as long as the values stored are loop invariant, then LICM should move store out of the loop to reduce memory operation.

You are right that in some cases LICM does reduce memory operations for coroutines.
Now that we have all agreed on the documentation part, let me think a bit more about this patch vs D87817 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87817>


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96928/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96928