[llvm] c58674d - [X86] Don't produce bad x86andp nodes for i1 vectors

Keno Fischer via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 7 17:19:40 PDT 2020


Author: Keno Fischer
Date: 2020-08-07T20:05:47-04:00
New Revision: c58674df147ac0e2777208376bfd2b0d9acbef48

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c58674df147ac0e2777208376bfd2b0d9acbef48
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c58674df147ac0e2777208376bfd2b0d9acbef48.diff

LOG: [X86] Don't produce bad x86andp nodes for i1 vectors

In D85499, I attempted to fix this same issue by canonicalizing
andnp for i1 vectors, but since there was some opposition to such
a change, this commit just fixes the bug by using two different
forms depending on which kind of vector type is in use. We can
then always decide to switch the canonical forms later.

Description of the original bug:
We have a DAG combine that tries to fold (vselect cond, 0000..., X) -> (andnp cond, x).
However, it does so by attempting to create an i64 vector with the number
of elements obtained by truncating division by 64 from the bitwidth. This is
bad for mask vectors like v8i1, since that division is just zero. Besides,
we don't want i64 vectors anyway. For i1 vectors, switch the pattern
to (andnp (not cond), x), which is the canonical form for `kandn`
on mask registers.

Fixes https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/36955.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85553

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
    llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-select.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 729c4207c8b6..37a8b4a998cb 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -39633,10 +39633,14 @@ combineVSelectWithAllOnesOrZeros(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
 
   // vselect Cond, 000..., X -> andn Cond, X
   if (TValIsAllZeros) {
-    MVT AndNVT = MVT::getVectorVT(MVT::i64, CondVT.getSizeInBits() / 64);
-    SDValue CastCond = DAG.getBitcast(AndNVT, Cond);
-    SDValue CastRHS = DAG.getBitcast(AndNVT, RHS);
-    SDValue AndN = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::ANDNP, DL, AndNVT, CastCond, CastRHS);
+    SDValue CastRHS = DAG.getBitcast(CondVT, RHS);
+    SDValue AndN;
+    // The canonical form 
diff ers for i1 vectors - x86andnp is not used
+    if (CondVT.getScalarType() == MVT::i1)
+      AndN = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, CondVT, DAG.getNOT(DL, Cond, CondVT),
+                         CastRHS);
+    else
+      AndN = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::ANDNP, DL, CondVT, Cond, CastRHS);
     return DAG.getBitcast(VT, AndN);
   }
 

diff  --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-select.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-select.ll
index 634757ddbf9d..a60f6ee06e73 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-select.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-select.ll
@@ -705,3 +705,64 @@ define void @select_v1i1(<1 x i1>* %w, <1 x i1>* %x, <1 x i1>* %y, i1 %z) nounwi
   store <1 x i1> %c, <1 x i1>* %x
   ret void
 }
+
+; Regression test from https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/36955
+define i8 @julia_issue36955(<8 x i1> %mask, <8 x double> %a) {
+; X86-AVX512F-LABEL: julia_issue36955:
+; X86-AVX512F:       # %bb.0:
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %zmm0
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    vpsllq $63, %zmm0, %zmm0
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    vxorpd %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    vcmplepd %zmm2, %zmm1, %k1
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    vptestmq %zmm0, %zmm0, %k0 {%k1}
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    korw %k0, %k1, %k0
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    kmovw %k0, %eax
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    # kill: def $al killed $al killed $eax
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    vzeroupper
+; X86-AVX512F-NEXT:    retl
+;
+; X64-AVX512F-LABEL: julia_issue36955:
+; X64-AVX512F:       # %bb.0:
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %zmm0
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    vpsllq $63, %zmm0, %zmm0
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    vxorpd %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    vcmplepd %zmm2, %zmm1, %k1
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    vptestmq %zmm0, %zmm0, %k0 {%k1}
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    korw %k0, %k1, %k0
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    kmovw %k0, %eax
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    # kill: def $al killed $al killed $eax
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    vzeroupper
+; X64-AVX512F-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; X86-AVX512BW-LABEL: julia_issue36955:
+; X86-AVX512BW:       # %bb.0:
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vpsllw $15, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vpxor %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vxorpd %xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm3
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vcmplepd %zmm3, %zmm1, %k1
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vpcmpgtw %zmm0, %zmm2, %k0 {%k1}
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    korw %k0, %k1, %k0
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    kmovd %k0, %eax
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    # kill: def $al killed $al killed $eax
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vzeroupper
+; X86-AVX512BW-NEXT:    retl
+;
+; X64-AVX512BW-LABEL: julia_issue36955:
+; X64-AVX512BW:       # %bb.0:
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vpsllw $15, %xmm0, %xmm0
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vpxor %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vxorpd %xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm3
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vcmplepd %zmm3, %zmm1, %k1
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vpcmpgtw %zmm0, %zmm2, %k0 {%k1}
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    korw %k0, %k1, %k0
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    kmovd %k0, %eax
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    # kill: def $al killed $al killed $eax
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    vzeroupper
+; X64-AVX512BW-NEXT:    retq
+  %fcmp = fcmp ugt <8 x double> %a, zeroinitializer
+  %xor = xor <8 x i1> %fcmp, <i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true>
+  %select1 = select <8 x i1> %fcmp, <8 x i1> zeroinitializer, <8 x i1> %mask
+  %select2 = select <8 x i1> %xor, <8 x i1> <i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true, i1 true>, <8 x i1> %select1
+  %ret = bitcast <8 x i1> %select2 to i8
+  ret i8 %ret
+}


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list