[llvm] 33f6542 - [SCCP] Regenerate test checks (NFC)

Nikita Popov via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 22 13:10:37 PDT 2020


Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2020-07-22T22:10:23+02:00
New Revision: 33f654201434eae330b0fd31de7c7a4bcbf869fc

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33f654201434eae330b0fd31de7c7a4bcbf869fc
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33f654201434eae330b0fd31de7c7a4bcbf869fc.diff

LOG: [SCCP] Regenerate test checks (NFC)

And adjust the indbrtest4 test to actually test what it's supposed
to. BB1 is supposed to be eliminated here, but isn't, because
BB0 still branches to it. This was lost due to the incomplete CHECK
lines.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/indirectbr.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/indirectbr.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/indirectbr.ll
index f54da3fb5918..8953e4003292 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/indirectbr.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/indirectbr.ll
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
 ; RUN: opt -S -ipsccp < %s | FileCheck %s
 
 declare void @BB0_f()
@@ -5,10 +6,14 @@ declare void @BB1_f()
 
 ; Make sure we can eliminate what is in BB0 as we know that the indirectbr is going to BB1.
 ;
-; CHECK-LABEL: define void @indbrtest1(
-; CHECK-NOT: call void @BB0_f()
-; CHECK: ret void
 define void @indbrtest1() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @indbrtest1(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BB1:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       BB1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @BB1_f()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
 entry:
   indirectbr i8* blockaddress(@indbrtest1, %BB1), [label %BB0, label %BB1]
 BB0:
@@ -23,10 +28,14 @@ BB1:
 ; by looking through the casts. The casts should be folded away when they are visited
 ; before the indirectbr instruction.
 ;
-; CHECK-LABEL: define void @indbrtest2(
-; CHECK-NOT: call void @BB0_f()
-; CHECK: ret void
 define void @indbrtest2() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @indbrtest2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BB1:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       BB1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @BB1_f()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
 entry:
   %a = ptrtoint i8* blockaddress(@indbrtest2, %BB1) to i64
   %b = inttoptr i64 %a to i8*
@@ -41,11 +50,19 @@ BB1:
 }
 
 ; Make sure we can not eliminate BB0 as we do not know the target of the indirectbr.
-;
-; CHECK-LABEL: define void @indbrtest3(
-; CHECK: call void @BB0_f()
-; CHECK: ret void
+
 define void @indbrtest3(i8** %Q) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @indbrtest3(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[T:%.*]] = load i8*, i8** [[Q:%.*]], align 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    indirectbr i8* [[T]], [label [[BB0:%.*]], label %BB1]
+; CHECK:       BB0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @BB0_f()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BB1:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       BB1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @BB1_f()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
 entry:
   %t = load i8*, i8** %Q
   indirectbr i8* %t, [label %BB0, label %BB1]
@@ -58,25 +75,41 @@ BB1:
 }
 
 ; Make sure we eliminate BB1 as we pick the first successor on undef.
-;
-; CHECK-LABEL: define void @indbrtest4(
-; CHECK: call void @BB0_f()
-; CHECK: ret void
+
 define void @indbrtest4(i8** %Q) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @indbrtest4(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BB0:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       BB0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @BB0_f()
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
 entry:
   indirectbr i8* undef, [label %BB0, label %BB1]
 BB0:
   call void @BB0_f()
-  br label %BB1
+  ret void
 BB1:
   call void @BB1_f()
   ret void
 }
 
-
-; CHECK-LABEL: define internal i32 @indbrtest5(
-; CHECK: ret i32 undef
 define internal i32 @indbrtest5(i1 %c) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @indbrtest5(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[C:%.*]], label [[BB1:%.*]], label [[BB2:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       bb1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BRANCH_BLOCK:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       bb2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BRANCH_BLOCK]]
+; CHECK:       branch.block:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ADDR:%.*]] = phi i8* [ blockaddress(@indbrtest5, [[TARGET1:%.*]]), [[BB1]] ], [ blockaddress(@indbrtest5, [[TARGET2:%.*]]), [[BB2]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    indirectbr i8* [[ADDR]], [label [[TARGET1]], label %target2]
+; CHECK:       target1:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[TARGET2]]
+; CHECK:       target2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 undef
+;
 entry:
   br i1 %c, label %bb1, label %bb2
 
@@ -100,9 +133,10 @@ target2:
 
 
 define i32 @indbrtest5_callee(i1 %c) {
-; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @indbrtest5_callee(
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %r = call i32 @indbrtest5(i1 %c)
+; CHECK-LABEL: @indbrtest5_callee(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = call i32 @indbrtest5(i1 [[C:%.*]])
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 10
+;
   %r = call i32 @indbrtest5(i1 %c)
   ret i32 %r
 }


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list