[PATCH] D81230: Correctly report modified status for LoopIdiomRecognize

[serge via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

serge-sans-paille added a comment.



> I'm not against trying to clean up the code; I'm just against asserting that we successfully managed to clean up the memory representation to exactly the same form it was in before we called expandCodeFor.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80707 should guarentee that this assertion actually holds, right?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81230/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81230