[PATCH] D79391: [DSE] Remove noop stores in MSSA.

Zoe Carver via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 8 11:48:14 PDT 2020


zoecarver marked an inline comment as done.
zoecarver added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp:1815
+    if (auto *Load = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(SI->getOperand(0))) {
+      if (Load->getPointerOperand() == SI->getOperand(1)) {
+        State.deleteDeadInstruction(SI);
----------------
asbirlea wrote:
> fhahn wrote:
> > I think the check is not strict enough at the moment. I think we have to ensure that there are no memory-writes between the load and the store that may alias them.
> > 
> > In the simple example below, IIUC the patch would currently incorrectly eliminate  ` store i32 %a, i32* %Q`.
> > 
> > ```
> > define void @test(i32* %Q) {
> >   %a = load i32, i32* %Q
> >   store i32 10, i32* %Q
> >   store i32 %a, i32* %Q
> >   ret void
> > }```
> > 
> > In terms of MemorySSA, I think we are looking for loads that use the same MemoryDef as `KillingDef`. One simple way to check this would be getting the memoryDef of KillingDef and check if it dominates the load I think.
> > 
> +1.
> Please add a testcase similar to the example fhahn@ gave.
Will do. I tried the test case and it fails. I'll need to re-write most of this patch (minus the tests). I think @fhahn's solution will work. I probably won't get to this today but I should have time this weekend. 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79391/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79391





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list