[PATCH] D77672: Support a few more SPARCv9 relocations

Tue Apr 7 21:46:04 PDT 2020

jrtc27 added a comment.

In D77672#1968560 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77672#1968560>, @ruiu wrote:

> Improving SPARC support is fine as long as we don't need to do something special for the ISA. But since no active maintainers have a SPARC machine, it is hard to find bugs in SPARC. Can you add tests for the new relocations?

For what it's worth, I have access to various SPARC machines, so can test things as needed. Also, the GCC compile farm (https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/) has multiple SPARC machines; in particular, gcc202 is managed by us Debian sparc64 porters, and has a beefy 64 cores and 64 GiB on a T5 (which, unlike some of the earlier UltraSparcs, has decent single-threaded performance too), so it should be easy for maintainers to test things if they're interested enough. The compile farm is a great resource in general that is really easy to sign up for and most don't know about.

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77672/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77672