buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-ppc64le-linux

Louis Dionne via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 24 20:12:26 PDT 2020



> On Mar 24, 2020, at 22:53, Louis Dionne via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 22:28, Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com <mailto:efriedma at quicinc.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> If the minimum required version is wrong, it should be fixed in the cmake_minimum_required directive.
> 
> You're right, I'll fix that.
> 
>> 
>> That said, we can't change the minimum build requirements for LLVM without giving anyone any notice.
>> Please revert your patch and bring it up on llvm-dev.  (This was discussed relatively recently in "RFC: Updating to CMake 3.15.0", but the effort stalled out.)
> 
> We're not changing the requirement for LLVM, just for libc++. I'll revert to avoid a CI mess, but I'll give a heads up tomorrow that we're bumping the requirement for libc++.

I created a thread on llvm-dev explaining the move and asking for objections.

Louis

> 
> Louis
> 
>> 
>> -Eli
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ldionne at apple.com <ldionne at apple.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 6:38 PM
>>> To: powerllvm at ca.ibm.com
>>> Cc: Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>; Amara Emerson
>>> <aemerson at apple.com>; Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>; Dan Liew
>>> <dan at su-root.co.uk>; Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com>; Erik Pilkington
>>> <erik.pilkington at gmail.com>; Johannes Doerfert <johannes at jdoerfert.de>;
>>> Michael Liao <michael.hliao at gmail.com>; Mitch Phillips
>>> <31459023+hctim at users.noreply.github.com>; Nikita Popov
>>> <nikita.ppv at gmail.com>; Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>; Sanjay Patel
>>> <spatel at rotateright.com>; Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>; Galina Kistanova
>>> <gkistanova at gmail.com>; llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org
>>> Subject: [EXT] Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-ppc64le-linux
>>> 
>>> Would it be possible to install a more recent version of CMake on this builder?
>>> Otherwise, you could also exclude libc++ from the LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS, as
>>> it requires a version of CMake more recent than what your build bot provides.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Louis
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 21:35, llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder sanitizer-ppc64le-linux
>>> while building llvm.
>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-ppc64le-linux/builds/9990
>>>> 
>>>> Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/
>>>> 
>>>> Buildslave for this Build: ppc64le-sanitizer
>>>> 
>>>> Build Reason: scheduler
>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch master]
>>> b684c1a50f70a39ceb51973950c5cca520ce8b2c
>>>> Blamelist: Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>,Amara Emerson
>>> <aemerson at apple.com>,Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>,Dan Liew
>>> <dan at su-root.co.uk>,Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com>,Erik Pilkington
>>> <erik.pilkington at gmail.com>,Johannes Doerfert
>>> <johannes at jdoerfert.de>,Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com>,Michael Liao
>>> <michael.hliao at gmail.com>,Mitch Phillips
>>> <31459023+hctim at users.noreply.github.com>,Nikita Popov
>>> <nikita.ppv at gmail.com>,Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>,Sanjay Patel
>>> <spatel at rotateright.com>,Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>
>>>> 
>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed annotate failed build fresh toolchain failed check-msan in
>>> gcc build failed check-tsan in gcc build failed bootstrap clang failed 64-bit check-
>>> msan failed 64-bit check-tsan failed test standalone compiler-rt failed build with
>>> ninja failed ninja check-sanitizer failed ninja check-asan failed ninja check-msan
>>> failed ninja check-scudo failed ninja check-tsan failed ninja check-ubsan failed
>>> ninja check-ubsan-minimal
>>>> 
>>>> sincerely,
>>>> -The Buildbot
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20200324/bc3a47e0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list