[PATCH] D73309: [lsan] Factor pthread-specific assumptions out of thread tracking code

[Oliver Stannard via llvm-commits]

Ping, the bot has been failing for a few weeks now, have you had a chance
to look into this?

Oliver

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 15:24, Oliver Stannard <oliver.stannard at linaro.org>
wrote:

> Hi Petr,
>
> The buildbot in question is still failing this test, was Yvan's
> information enough for you to be able to investigate it, or do you need
> anything else from us?
>
> Oliver
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:50, Yvan Roux via llvm-commits <
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Petr,
>>
>> when I ru it manually, the output of the test before commit 38fd180 is:
>> ----->
>> Test alloc: 0xf4f03680
>> Value after LSan: 0xf4f03680
>>
>> =================================================================
>> ==904==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
>>
>> Direct leak of 1337 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
>>     #0 0xb0188  (/home/yvan.roux/build/good.tmp+0xb0188)
>>     #1 0xe5570  (/home/yvan.roux/build/good.tmp+0xe5570)
>>     #2 0xf74ac8a8  (/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6+0x168a8)
>>
>> Objects leaked above:
>> 0xf4f03680 (1337 bytes)
>>
>> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 1337 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
>> <-----
>> and I only got the first two line after (with sometimes the right
>> output if I run it several times)
>> ----->
>> Test alloc: 0xf4f03680
>> Value after LSan: 0xf4f03680
>> <-----
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 03:03, Petr Hosek <phosek at google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Yvan,
>> >
>> > Would it be possible to get some more details, e.g. getting a full
>> output from the test? I've tried reproducing this failure on other
>> platforms but I'm not seeing the same issue and we don't have access to any
>> armv7 boards.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Petr
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:05 AM Yvan Roux <yvan.roux at linaro.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Roland and Petr,
>> >>
>> >> One of the patches in this series broke armv7 full bot, we got some
>> >> issue on the bot and didn't have time to bisect and reproduce the
>> >> issue, but here are the last logs:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-full/builds/8982/steps/ninja%20check%202/logs/FAIL%3A%20LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-armhf%3A%3Astale_stack_leak.cpp
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Yvan
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 02:03, Petr Hosek via Phabricator via
>> >> llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed
>> changes.
>> >> > Closed by commit rG38fd1806a169: [lsan] Factor pthread-specific
>> assumptions out of thread tracking code (authored by mcgrathr, committed by
>> phosek).
>> >> >
>> >> > Repository:
>> >> >   rG LLVM Github Monorepo
>> >> >
>> >> > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
>> >> >   https://reviews.llvm.org/D73309/new/
>> >> >
>> >> > https://reviews.llvm.org/D73309
>> >> >
>> >> > Files:
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/CMakeLists.txt
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan.cpp
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan.h
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_posix.cpp
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_posix.h
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_thread.cpp
>> >> >   compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_thread.h
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > llvm-commits mailing list
>> >> > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> >> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20200218/a74c15b7/attachment.html>