[PATCH] D72665: [X86] Break the loop in LowerReturn into 2 loops.

Pengfei Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 13 18:41:44 PST 2020

Previous message: [PATCH] D72665: [X86] Break the loop in LowerReturn into 2 loops.
Next message: [PATCH] D72665: [X86] Break the loop in LowerReturn into 2 loops.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

pengfei added a comment.

Do we really need to distinguish `STRICT_FP_EXTEND` and `FP_EXTEND` for a return? Currently the `STRICT` nodes are used to avoid to be optimized out or reordered. But I think neither occurs for a return.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72665/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72665

Previous message: [PATCH] D72665: [X86] Break the loop in LowerReturn into 2 loops.
Next message: [PATCH] D72665: [X86] Break the loop in LowerReturn into 2 loops.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list