[PATCH] D71849: Don't rely on '%l' modifiers to indicate a label reference
Nick Desaulniers via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 6 12:33:34 PST 2020
nickdesaulniers added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp:470
+ !MI->getOperand(OpNo).isBlockAddress() &&
+ !MI->getOperand(OpNo).isMBB()) {
+ Error = true;
----------------
void wrote:
> nickdesaulniers wrote:
> > Would you mind hoisting the expression `MI->getOperand(OpNo)` into a local variable defined above near the definition of `OpNo`? It would DRY up this code.
> The compiler should do this already, because `MI` is `const` and `getOperand` has no side-effects. I think that's who no one has bothered to do it before.
No doubt, but it's annoying to continually type out the full expression, hence the request to DRY up the code. Please make that change.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp:470
+ !MI->getOperand(OpNo).isBlockAddress() &&
+ !MI->getOperand(OpNo).isMBB()) {
+ Error = true;
----------------
Technically, here `!MI->getOperand(OpNo).isBlockAddress() && !MI->getOperand(OpNo).isMBB()` is tautalogically false (due to the earlier checks), so you'd only need to check for `l`. Maybe a comment like `// %l should have been handled by the above conditions already.`, too would be nice.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71849/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71849
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list