[PATCH] D70460: export.sh: Fetch sources from GitHub instead of SVN

Michał Górny via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 21 01:49:30 PST 2019


mgorny added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/utils/release/export.sh:53
+
+    for proj in $projects; do
+        echo "Creating tarball for $proj ..."
----------------
hans wrote:
> sylvestre.ledru wrote:
> > tstellar wrote:
> > > hans wrote:
> > > > When I was thinking about this, I figured maybe we should just ship llvm-project.tar.xz and test-suite.tar.xz, rather than split up into the old project structure?
> > > > 
> > > > It seems odd in a way to release in a format that doesn't match the code layout used by developers. Do you think the llvm-projects.tar.xz tarball would be prohibitively large? Or that the change is too large for users of the release?
> > > If we distributed a single tarball, that would be easy, because GitHub creates one for us and adds it to the list of release assets.  The gz compressed file generated by GitHub is 108M. 
> > > 
> > > However, as a distro packager, I prefer having the separate tarballs because that's what we use for building packages on Fedora and RHEL.
> > > 
> > > @mgorny, @sylvestre.ledru  Do you have any thoughts about this?
> > For Debian & Ubuntu, I moved to a single tarball containing it all. Splitting tarballs doesn't bring much values compare to the maintenance cost.
> > 
> > BTW, using xz, the tarball is only 72M for 9.0.0
> > 
> I see.
> 
> I don't have strong opinions about this, but I always assumed that the non-monorepo layout build would go away at some point after the migration.
> 
> Maybe we should release both an llvm-project.tgz "monorepo tarball" and the separate ones for a while?
I would prefer split tarballs. There is still a vast number of Gentoo systems whose users interface with LLVM only through Mesa dependencies, and they only need the main LLVM component (and no clang, in the more common case).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70460/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70460





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list