[PATCH] D69760: [Clang][Driver] Don't pun -fuse-ld=lld as -fuse-ld=lld-link with msvc

John Ericson via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 8 10:08:14 PST 2019


Ericson2314 added a comment.

While I am fine making `-fuse-ld=lld` mean "use that lld driver most appropriate for the clang driver", in principle the clang driver and lld driver choices are orthogonal, and I'd want to expose that with something like `-fuse-ld=ld.lld` to compliment `-fuse-ld=lld-link`. How does that sound? Should we support `-fuse-ld=ld.bfd` and `-fuse-ld=ld64.lld` too?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list