[llvm] a5c8ec4 - [CGDebugInfo] Emit subprograms for decls when AT_tail_call is understood

Adrian Prantl via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 7 11:12:32 PST 2019



> On Nov 7, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Vedant Kumar <vedant_kumar at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> + Clément & Eric (not sure why Eric was dropped from the thread, sorry about that)
> 
> The verifier failure is due to a combination of
> 1) The declaration of @memcmp being assigned a DISubprogram, and
> 2) The MergeICmps pass doesn't assign a debug location to the memcmps it generates
> 
> Hence, "inlinable function call" (memcmp) "in a function with debug info must have a !dbg location".
> 
> I think this could be addressed by either
> 1) Not assigning DISubprograms to builtin functions or

Do we have any kind of useful non-redundant information in the DISubprogram for a builtin? Otherwise this seems fine to me.

-- adrian

> 2) Having MergeICmps assigning some location to the memcmps it generates (probably a merged / line 0 location, but maybe the location of the first icmp if that'd be more helpful).
> 
> Or both. (1) would shrink debug info size a little, and seems simpler to implement, so I'll start there.
> 
> Anyone have thoughts on (2), or other suggestions?
> 
> thanks
> vedant
> 
>> On Nov 7, 2019, at 10:27 AM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for reverting. I'll dig into this today.
>> 
>> vedant
>> 
>>> On Nov 7, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Eric Christopher via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Hans!
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 1:32 AM Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org <mailto:hans at chromium.org>> wrote:
>>> In Chromium it broke the build in a few configurations, so I've
>>> reverted in 5b9a072c39c.
>>> 
>>> See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1022296#c1 <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1022296#c1>
>>> for reproducer.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:05 AM Eric Christopher via llvm-commits
>>> <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > As a heads up we're starting to see a problem around this commit with
>>> > backtraces for inline functions with msan where the line number has
>>> > gone away (replaced with 0).
>>> >
>>> > Dave is looking at it, but I thought I'd send a message as early as I could.
>>> >
>>> > -eric
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:14 PM Vedant Kumar via llvm-commits
>>> > <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Author: Vedant Kumar
>>> > > Date: 2019-11-04T15:14:24-08:00
>>> > > New Revision: a5c8ec4baa2c00d8dbca36ffd236a40f9e0c07ed
>>> > >
>>> > > URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5c8ec4baa2c00d8dbca36ffd236a40f9e0c07ed <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5c8ec4baa2c00d8dbca36ffd236a40f9e0c07ed>
>>> > > DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5c8ec4baa2c00d8dbca36ffd236a40f9e0c07ed.diff <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5c8ec4baa2c00d8dbca36ffd236a40f9e0c07ed.diff>
>>> > >
>>> > > LOG: [CGDebugInfo] Emit subprograms for decls when AT_tail_call is understood
>>> > >
>>> > > Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the
>>> > > target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values
>>> > > (DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent).
>>> > >
>>> > > Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU
>>> > > tail calls.
>>> > >
>>> > > Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call:
>>> > >
>>> > > ```
>>> > >   * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
>>> > >     frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
>>> > > ```
>>> > >
>>> > > Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible):
>>> > >
>>> > > ```
>>> > >   * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
>>> > >     frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial]
>>> > >     frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
>>> > > ```
>>> > >
>>> > > rdar://46577651 <rdar://46577651>
>>> > >
>>> > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743>
>>> > >
>>> > > Added:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Modified:
>>> > >     clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp
>>> > >     clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-extern-call.c
>>> > >     clang/test/CodeGenCXX/dbg-info-all-calls-described.cpp
>>> > >     llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dwarf-callsite-related-attrs.ll
>>> > >
>>> > > Removed:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ################################################################################
>>> > > diff  --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp
>>> > > index e0bb3fda7acf..c0c8fd3c8f16 100644
>>> > > --- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp
>>> > > +++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp
>>> > > @@ -3748,9 +3748,7 @@ void CGDebugInfo::EmitFunctionDecl(GlobalDecl GD, SourceLocation Loc,
>>> > >  void CGDebugInfo::EmitFuncDeclForCallSite(llvm::CallBase *CallOrInvoke,
>>> > >                                            QualType CalleeType,
>>> > >                                            const FunctionDecl *CalleeDecl) {
>>> > > -  auto &CGOpts = CGM.getCodeGenOpts();
>>> > > -  if (!CGOpts.EnableDebugEntryValues || !CGM.getLangOpts().Optimize ||
>>> > > -      !CallOrInvoke)
>>> > > +  if (!CallOrInvoke || getCallSiteRelatedAttrs() == llvm::DINode::FlagZero)
>>> > >      return;
>>> > >
>>> > >    auto *Func = CallOrInvoke->getCalledFunction();
>>> > > @@ -4824,10 +4822,10 @@ llvm::DINode::DIFlags CGDebugInfo::getCallSiteRelatedAttrs() const {
>>> > >    bool SupportsDWARFv4Ext =
>>> > >        CGM.getCodeGenOpts().DwarfVersion == 4 &&
>>> > >        (CGM.getCodeGenOpts().getDebuggerTuning() == llvm::DebuggerKind::LLDB ||
>>> > > -       (CGM.getCodeGenOpts().EnableDebugEntryValues &&
>>> > > -       CGM.getCodeGenOpts().getDebuggerTuning() == llvm::DebuggerKind::GDB));
>>> > > +       CGM.getCodeGenOpts().getDebuggerTuning() == llvm::DebuggerKind::GDB);
>>> > >
>>> > > -  if (!SupportsDWARFv4Ext && CGM.getCodeGenOpts().DwarfVersion < 5)
>>> > > +  if (!SupportsDWARFv4Ext && CGM.getCodeGenOpts().DwarfVersion < 5 &&
>>> > > +      !CGM.getCodeGenOpts().EnableDebugEntryValues)
>>> > >      return llvm::DINode::FlagZero;
>>> > >
>>> > >    return llvm::DINode::FlagAllCallsDescribed;
>>> > >
>>> > > diff  --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-extern-call.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-extern-call.c
>>> > > index e35669b78f93..7f58fe59a635 100644
>>> > > --- a/clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-extern-call.c
>>> > > +++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-extern-call.c
>>> > > @@ -1,8 +1,21 @@
>>> > > -// RUN: %clang -Xclang -femit-debug-entry-values -g -O2 -target x86_64-none-linux-gnu -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EXT
>>> > > -// CHECK-EXT: !DISubprogram(name: "fn1"
>>> > > +// When entry values are emitted, expect a subprogram for extern decls so that
>>> > > +// the dwarf generator can describe call site parameters at extern call sites.
>>> > > +//
>>> > > +// RUN: %clang -Xclang -femit-debug-entry-values -g -O2 -target x86_64-none-linux-gnu -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=ENTRY-VAL
>>> > > +// ENTRY-VAL: !DISubprogram(name: "fn1"
>>> > >
>>> > > -// RUN: %clang -g -O2 -target x86_64-none-linux-gnu -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
>>> > > -// CHECK-NOT: !DISubprogram(name: "fn1"
>>> > > +// Similarly, when the debugger tuning is gdb, expect a subprogram for extern
>>> > > +// decls so that the dwarf generator can describe information needed for tail
>>> > > +// call frame reconstrution.
>>> > > +//
>>> > > +// RUN: %clang -g -O2 -target x86_64-none-linux-gnu -ggdb -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=GDB
>>> > > +// GDB: !DISubprogram(name: "fn1"
>>> > > +//
>>> > > +// Do not emit a subprogram for extern decls when entry values are disabled and
>>> > > +// the tuning is not set to gdb.
>>> > > +//
>>> > > +// RUN: %clang -g -O2 -target x86_64-none-linux-gnu -gsce -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=SCE
>>> > > +// SCE-NOT: !DISubprogram(name: "fn1"
>>> > >
>>> > >  extern int fn1(int a, int b);
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > diff  --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/dbg-info-all-calls-described.cpp b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/dbg-info-all-calls-described.cpp
>>> > > index 1cb2b6c609f3..667c2469b55e 100644
>>> > > --- a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/dbg-info-all-calls-described.cpp
>>> > > +++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/dbg-info-all-calls-described.cpp
>>> > > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>>> > >
>>> > >  // NO-ATTR-NOT: FlagAllCallsDescribed
>>> > >
>>> > > +// HAS-ATTR-DAG: DISubprogram(name: "declaration1", {{.*}}, flags: DIFlagPrototyped
>>> > >  // HAS-ATTR-DAG: DISubprogram(name: "declaration2", {{.*}}, flags: DIFlagPrototyped | DIFlagAllCallsDescribed, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition
>>> > >  // HAS-ATTR-DAG: DISubprogram(name: "struct1", {{.*}}, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagOptimized)
>>> > >  // HAS-ATTR-DAG: DISubprogram(name: "struct1", {{.*}}, flags: DIFlagPrototyped | DIFlagAllCallsDescribed, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition
>>> > >
>>> > > diff  --git a/llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dwarf-callsite-related-attrs.ll b/llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dwarf-callsite-related-attrs.ll
>>> > > index c37ce1eb7fbe..33e06faba57b 100644
>>> > > --- a/llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dwarf-callsite-related-attrs.ll
>>> > > +++ b/llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dwarf-callsite-related-attrs.ll
>>> > > @@ -25,6 +25,14 @@
>>> > >
>>> > >  @sink = global i32 0, align 4, !dbg !0
>>> > >
>>> > > +define void @__has_no_subprogram() {
>>> > > +entry:
>>> > > +  %0 = load volatile i32, i32* @sink, align 4
>>> > > +  %inc = add nsw i32 %0, 1
>>> > > +  store volatile i32 %inc, i32* @sink, align 4
>>> > > +  ret void
>>> > > +}
>>> > > +
>>> > >  ; ASM: DW_TAG_subprogram
>>> > >  ; ASM:   DW_AT_call_all_calls
>>> > >  ; OBJ: [[bat_sp:.*]]: DW_TAG_subprogram
>>> > > @@ -70,6 +78,7 @@ entry:
>>> > >  ; OBJ:     DW_AT_call_tail_call
>>> > >  define void @_Z3foov() !dbg !25 {
>>> > >  entry:
>>> > > +  tail call void @__has_no_subprogram()
>>> > >    tail call void @_Z3barv(), !dbg !26
>>> > >    tail call void @_Z3batv(), !dbg !27
>>> > >    tail call void @_Z3barv(), !dbg !26
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > llvm-commits mailing list
>>> > > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
>>> > > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > llvm-commits mailing list
>>> > llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
>>> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20191107/66f6fd38/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list