[llvm] r373820 - [UnitTests] Try and pacify gcc-5

[James Molloy via llvm-commits]

Author: jamesm
Date: Sat Oct  5 01:57:17 2019
New Revision: 373820

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=373820&view=rev
Log:
[UnitTests] Try and pacify gcc-5

This looks like a defect in gcc-5 where it chooses a constexpr
constructor from the initializer-list that it considers to be explicit.

I've tried to reproduce but I can't install anything prior to gcc-6 easily
on my system, and that doesn't have the error. So this is speculative
pacification.

Reported by Steven Wan.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/unittests/TableGen/AutomataTest.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/unittests/TableGen/AutomataTest.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/TableGen/AutomataTest.cpp?rev=373820&r1=373819&r2=373820&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/unittests/TableGen/AutomataTest.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/unittests/TableGen/AutomataTest.cpp Sat Oct  5 01:57:17 2019
@@ -62,16 +62,16 @@ TEST(Automata, TupleAutomatonAccepts) {
   Automaton<TupleAutomatonAction> A(makeArrayRef(TupleAutomatonTransitions));
   A.reset();
   EXPECT_TRUE(
-      A.add({SK_a, SK_b, "yeet"}));
+      A.add(TupleAutomatonAction{SK_a, SK_b, "yeet"}));
   A.reset();
   EXPECT_FALSE(
-      A.add({SK_a, SK_a, "yeet"}));
+      A.add(TupleAutomatonAction{SK_a, SK_a, "yeet"}));
   A.reset();
   EXPECT_FALSE(
-      A.add({SK_a, SK_b, "feet"}));
+      A.add(TupleAutomatonAction{SK_a, SK_b, "feet"}));
   A.reset();
   EXPECT_TRUE(
-      A.add({SK_b, SK_b, "foo"}));
+      A.add(TupleAutomatonAction{SK_b, SK_b, "foo"}));
 }
 
 TEST(Automata, NfaAutomatonAccepts) {