[PATCH] D65803: [MVE] Don't try to unroll vectorised MVE loops

Sam Parker via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 6 08:48:00 PDT 2019


samparker added a comment.

Yes, I guess that would be sensible approach! I am worried that one of the (many) passes will trip somewhere, so this gives me another example test case... For performance, I'm still not convinced this is the best approach because (1) we can't depend on metadata and (2) doesn't this also prevent the scalar remainder from being unrolled too?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D65803/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D65803





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list