[PATCH] D64412: [Strict FP] Allow more relaxed scheduling

[Cameron McInally via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

cameron.mcinally added a comment.

Bah, my last comment was flawed! I read the test cases incorrectly and missed the 'fpexcept.ignore' on some of them.

But I think the question is still partially valid. What defines sequencing traps and stores? Are we (LLVM) defining something more strict than IEEE-754 and the C/C++ Standards?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64412/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64412