[PATCH] D63011: [docs]Move llvm-readobj from "Developer Tools" to "Basic Commands"

[James Henderson via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

jhenderson added a comment.

In D63011#1534304 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011#1534304>, @rupprecht wrote:

> In D63011#1534282 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011#1534282>, @jhenderson wrote:
>
> > Thanks @MaskRay.
> >
> > In D63011#1534265 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011#1534265>, @MaskRay wrote:
> >
> > > Since  llvm-objdump and llvm-nm are in the "Basic Commands" list, and llvm-readobj is used in various test directories: `CodeGen/DebugInfo/MC/LTO/...`, I think it qualifies as a Basic Command :)
> >
> >
> > I //think// the distinction is "tools in LLVM used by people" versus "tools used by LLVM developers (mostly for testing/debugging)".
>
>
> Are you saying LLVM developers aren't people? :p


Haha, sorry, that first bit should say "by people outside of LLVM development" or something...

In D63011#1534304 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011#1534304>, @rupprecht wrote:

> I actually wonder if we should split out all the binary utilities to a separate section. We should try to advertise the replacement-ness of all the tools we have.


That's probably not a bad shout, though we'd have to figure out exactly what we mean by "binary utilities" as I suspect everybody has a slightly different interpretation of this. Maybe a section labelled "GNU replacements" (note that llvm-readobj wouldn't actually qualify under this!)?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63011