[PATCH] D59541: [InstSimplify] SimplifyICmpInst - icmp eq/ne %X, undef -> undef

Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 19 05:03:29 PDT 2019


RKSimon created this revision.
RKSimon added reviewers: spatel, efriedma, nlopes, davide.
Herald added subscribers: jdoerfert, Prazek.
Herald added a project: LLVM.

As discussed on PR41125 and D59363 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59363>, we have a mismatch between icmp eq/ne cases with an undef operand:

When the other operand is constant we fold to undef (handled in ConstantFoldCompareInstruction)
When the other operand is non-constant we fold to a bool constant based on isTrueWhenEqual (handled in SimplifyICmpInst).

Neither it really wrong, but this patch changes the logic in SimplifyICmpInst to consistently fold to undef.

The NewGVN test change is annoying (as with most heavily reduced tests) but AFAICT I have kept the purpose of the test based on rL291968 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL291968>.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59541

Files:
  lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
  test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
  test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr31613.ll


Index: test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr31613.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr31613.ll
+++ test/Transforms/NewGVN/pr31613.ll
@@ -71,32 +71,35 @@
 
 declare void @c.d.p(i64, i8*)
 
-define void @e() {
+define void @e(i32 %a0, i32 %a1, %struct.a** %p2) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @e(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[F:%.*]] = alloca i32
-; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 undef, i32* [[F]], !g !0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 [[A0:%.*]], i32* [[F]], !g !0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[H:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       h:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @c.d.p(i64 8, i8* undef)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[F]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[J:%.*]] = load i32, i32* null
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label [[L:%.*]], label [[Q:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[K:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[I]], [[J]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[K]], label [[L:%.*]], label [[Q:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       l:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[R:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       q:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    store i8 undef, i8* null
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[M:%.*]] = load %struct.a*, %struct.a** null
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[R]]
 ; CHECK:       r:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    switch i32 undef, label [[N:%.*]] [
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    i32 0, label [[S:%.*]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ]
 ; CHECK:       s:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 [[A1:%.*]], i32* [[F]], !g !0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[H]]
 ; CHECK:       n:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[O:%.*]] = load %struct.a*, %struct.a** null
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[O:%.*]] = load %struct.a*, %struct.a** [[P2:%.*]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
 ;
   %f = alloca i32
-  store i32 undef, i32* %f, !g !0
+  store i32 %a0, i32* %f, !g !0
   br label %h
 
 h:                                                ; preds = %s, %0
@@ -120,11 +123,11 @@
   ]
 
 s:                                                ; preds = %r
-  store i32 undef, i32* %f, !g !0
+  store i32 %a1, i32* %f, !g !0
   br label %h
 
 n:                                                ; preds = %r
-  %o = load %struct.a*, %struct.a** null
+  %o = load %struct.a*, %struct.a** %p2
   %2 = bitcast %struct.a* %o to %struct.b*
   ret void
 }
Index: test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
+++ test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@
 ; PR4837
 define <2 x i1> @test5_eq(<2 x i64> %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test5_eq(
-; CHECK-NEXT:    ret <2 x i1> <i1 true, i1 true>
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret <2 x i1> undef
 ;
   %V = icmp eq <2 x i64> %x, undef
   ret <2 x i1> %V
 }
 define <2 x i1> @test5_ne(<2 x i64> %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test5_ne(
-; CHECK-NEXT:    ret <2 x i1> zeroinitializer
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret <2 x i1> undef
 ;
   %V = icmp ne <2 x i64> %x, undef
   ret <2 x i1> %V
Index: lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
@@ -3048,6 +3048,14 @@
 
   Type *ITy = GetCompareTy(LHS); // The return type.
 
+  // For EQ and NE, we can always pick a value for the undef to make the
+  // predicate pass or fail, so we can return undef.
+  // Also, if both operands are undef, we can return undef.
+  // Matches behavior in llvm::ConstantFoldCompareInstruction.
+  if (isa<UndefValue>(RHS) &&
+      (ICmpInst::isEquality(Pred) || isa<UndefValue>(LHS)))
+    return UndefValue::get(ITy);
+
   // icmp X, X -> true/false
   // icmp X, undef -> true/false because undef could be X.
   if (LHS == RHS || isa<UndefValue>(RHS))


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D59541.191271.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3599 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20190319/7b133927/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list