[PATCH] D58704: Initial (incomplete) implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld.

[Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

reames added a comment.

My main concern with this design is how you plan to integrate this with the existing infrastructure.  Are you planning on laying this under RuntimeDyLD?  Or somehow factoring out common implementation to be used by both?  I'm generally bothered by the seeming duplication of such a fragile piece of infrastructure.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704