[PATCH] D56819: Document toolchain update policy

[Craig Topper via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

craig.topper added inline comments.


================
Comment at: docs/GettingStarted.rst:270
+    minimum. This time-based guideline is not strict: we may support much older
+    compilers, or decide to support fewer ones.
+
----------------
jfb wrote:
> craig.topper wrote:
> > Was "fewer" here supposed to be "newer"? Or is just the "fewer ones" doesn't read very well?
> Maybe it's my ESL, I definitely mean "fewer" as in "fewer versions than a 3 year loopback would otherwise capture". I'm happy to clarify however you think would make sense.
Maybe just change "ones" to "versions"?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819