[PATCH] D50913: [FPEnv] Don't need copysign/fabs/fneg constrained intrinsics

[Cameron McInally via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

cameron.mcinally added a comment.

There hasn't been any strong objects, but I haven't seen many strong accepts either besides the few main stakeholders. I'm under the assumption that silence is a passive reject in situations like this.

Should I keep pushing for it? It felt like I was beating a dead horse...


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D50913