[PATCH] D51089: [LLD] [COFF] Add support for creating range extension thunks for ARM

[Martin Storsjö via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mstorsjo added a comment.

@ruiu - Do you have time to proceed with this one? Is the performance regression, which now is smaller thanks to your suggeation, acceptable? Or should I try other alternatives which make messier code with different codepaths for architectures that don't need thunks?

The thunk algorithm here should be good to go now (no longer RFC level), in case @peter.smith wants to have another look (it's just a few minor improvements over the original one, which was more or less ok'd).


https://reviews.llvm.org/D51089