[llvm] r339005 - Re-enable "[ValueTracking] Teach isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition about AND"

Max Kazantsev via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 6 04:14:18 PDT 2018


Author: mkazantsev
Date: Mon Aug  6 04:14:18 2018
New Revision: 339005

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=339005&view=rev
Log:
Re-enable "[ValueTracking] Teach isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition about AND"

The patch was reverted because of bug detected by sanitizer. The bug is fixed,
respective tests added.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50172

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoist-deref-load.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp?rev=339005&r1=339004&r2=339005&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp Mon Aug  6 04:14:18 2018
@@ -1860,19 +1860,42 @@ static bool isKnownNonNullFromDominating
         (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_NE))
       continue;
 
+    SmallVector<const User *, 4> WorkList;
+    SmallPtrSet<const User *, 4> Visited;
     for (auto *CmpU : U->users()) {
-      if (const BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(CmpU)) {
-        assert(BI->isConditional() && "uses a comparison!");
+      assert(WorkList.empty() && "Should be!");
+      if (Visited.insert(CmpU).second)
+        WorkList.push_back(CmpU);
 
-        BasicBlock *NonNullSuccessor =
-            BI->getSuccessor(Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? 1 : 0);
-        BasicBlockEdge Edge(BI->getParent(), NonNullSuccessor);
-        if (Edge.isSingleEdge() && DT->dominates(Edge, CtxI->getParent()))
+      while (!WorkList.empty()) {
+        auto *Curr = WorkList.pop_back_val();
+
+        // If a user is an AND, add all its users to the work list. We only
+        // propagate "pred != null" condition through AND because it is only
+        // correct to assume that all conditions of AND are met in true branch.
+        // TODO: Support similar logic of OR and EQ predicate?
+        if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
+          if (auto *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Curr))
+            if (BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::And) {
+              for (auto *BOU : BO->users())
+                if (Visited.insert(BOU).second)
+                  WorkList.push_back(BOU);
+              continue;
+            }
+
+        if (const BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Curr)) {
+          assert(BI->isConditional() && "uses a comparison!");
+
+          BasicBlock *NonNullSuccessor =
+              BI->getSuccessor(Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? 1 : 0);
+          BasicBlockEdge Edge(BI->getParent(), NonNullSuccessor);
+          if (Edge.isSingleEdge() && DT->dominates(Edge, CtxI->getParent()))
+            return true;
+        } else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE &&
+                   match(Curr, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::experimental_guard>()) &&
+                   DT->dominates(cast<Instruction>(Curr), CtxI)) {
           return true;
-      } else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE &&
-                 match(CmpU, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::experimental_guard>()) &&
-                 DT->dominates(cast<Instruction>(CmpU), CtxI)) {
-        return true;
+        }
       }
     }
   }

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoist-deref-load.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoist-deref-load.ll?rev=339005&r1=339004&r2=339005&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoist-deref-load.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoist-deref-load.ll Mon Aug  6 04:14:18 2018
@@ -556,5 +556,171 @@ for.end:
   ret void
 }
 
+; Check that branch by condition "null check AND something" allows to hoist the
+; load.
+define void @test14(i32* noalias %a, i32* %b, i32* dereferenceable_or_null(4) %c, i32 %n, i1 %dummy_cond) #0 {
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test14
+; CHECK: load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+; CHECK: for.body:
+
+entry:
+  %not_null = icmp ne i32* %c, null
+  %dummy_and = and i1 %not_null, %dummy_cond
+  br i1 %dummy_and, label %not.null, label %for.end
+
+not.null:
+  %cmp11 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0
+  br i1 %cmp11, label %for.body, label %for.end
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %not.null, %for.inc
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ], [ 0, %not.null ]
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %0, 0
+  br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %for.inc
+
+if.then:                                          ; preds = %for.body
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+  %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %b, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %2, %1
+  store i32 %mul, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  br label %for.inc
+
+for.inc:                                          ; preds = %for.body, %if.then
+  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.inc, %entry, %not.null
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Check that guard by condition "null check AND something" allows to hoist the
+; load.
+define void @test15(i32* noalias %a, i32* %b, i32* dereferenceable_or_null(4) %c, i32 %n, i1 %dummy_cond) #0 {
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test15
+; CHECK: load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+; CHECK: for.body:
+
+entry:
+  %not_null = icmp ne i32* %c, null
+  %dummy_and = and i1 %not_null, %dummy_cond
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %dummy_and) [ "deopt"() ]
+  %cmp11 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0
+  br i1 %cmp11, label %for.body, label %for.end
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %entry, %for.inc
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ], [ 0, %entry ]
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %0, 0
+  br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %for.inc
+
+if.then:                                          ; preds = %for.body
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+  %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %b, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %2, %1
+  store i32 %mul, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  br label %for.inc
+
+for.inc:                                          ; preds = %for.body, %if.then
+  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Ensure that (c == null && other_cond) does not automatically mean that c is
+; non-null in false branch. So the condition ((c == null && other_cond) == false)
+; is not sufficient to conclude that c != null.
+define void @test16(i32* noalias %a, i32* %b, i32* dereferenceable_or_null(4) %c, i32 %n, i1 %dummy_cond) #0 {
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test16
+; CHECK: for.body:
+; CHECK: load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+
+entry:
+  %not_null = icmp eq i32* %c, null
+  %dummy_and = and i1 %not_null, %dummy_cond
+  br i1 %dummy_and, label %for.end, label %not.null
+
+not.null:
+  %cmp11 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0
+  br i1 %cmp11, label %for.body, label %for.end
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %not.null, %for.inc
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ], [ 0, %not.null ]
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %0, 0
+  br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %for.inc
+
+if.then:                                          ; preds = %for.body
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+  %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %b, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %2, %1
+  store i32 %mul, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  br label %for.inc
+
+for.inc:                                          ; preds = %for.body, %if.then
+  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.inc, %entry, %not.null
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Ensure that (c == null && other_cond) does not automatically mean that c is
+; non-null in false branch. So the condition ((c == null && other_cond) == false)
+; is not sufficient to conclude that c != null.
+define void @test17(i32* noalias %a, i32* %b, i32* dereferenceable_or_null(4) %c, i32 %n, i1 %dummy_cond) #0 {
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test17
+; CHECK: for.body:
+; CHECK: load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+
+entry:
+  %not_null = icmp eq i32* %c, null
+  %dummy_and = and i1 %not_null, %dummy_cond
+  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %dummy_and) [ "deopt"() ]
+  %cmp11 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0
+  br i1 %cmp11, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %entry, %for.inc
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ], [ 0, %entry ]
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %a, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %0, 0
+  br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %for.inc
+
+if.then:                                          ; preds = %for.body
+  %1 = load i32, i32* %c, align 4
+  %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %b, i64 %indvars.iv
+  %2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %2, %1
+  store i32 %mul, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
+  br label %for.inc
+
+for.inc:                                          ; preds = %for.body, %if.then
+  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
+  ret void
+}
+
 attributes #0 = { nounwind uwtable }
 !0 = !{i64 4}




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list