[PATCH] D46884: [AArch64] Cortex-A55 scheduler model

[Junmo Park via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

flyingforyou added a comment.

Hi Javed.

> Could you please provide some more information, if possible, on the possible source of regressions (i.e. where cycles were lost). Are the commercial benchmarks - memory intensive? floating-point intensive? control dominant.

About commercial benchmark(geekbench) result, I will run it more than 100 times & figure out which one has problem. I suspect the issue is with new branch predictor in CA55. But I am not sure now.
I think you cat get the answer about category of commercial benchmarks. :)


https://reviews.llvm.org/D46884