[polly] r327216 - Add isl operator overloads for isl::pw_aff

Tobias Grosser via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 20 09:26:42 PDT 2018


On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, at 11:58, Michael Kruse via llvm-commits wrote:
> 2018-03-17 7:34 GMT+01:00 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018, at 00:34, Michael Kruse wrote:,
> >> Shouldn't such changes go through a review?
> >
> > In retrospective, it certainly should. At least one issue slipped in (see below). Would you mind doing a post-commit review or should I revert and put it on phab?
> 
> I am primarily interested in a review to discuss whether this is the
> direction to go. It is the difference between whether Polly is a
> personal or community project. We could, e.g. assume that overloads
> will eventually be part of isl C++ bindings, instead of every user of
> isl needing its own overloads. I know we had this discussion on
> isl-development already, but AFAIK we did not come to a conclusion.
> 
> However, I am personally fine with adding such overloads. The C++
> bindings are currently now part of isl anyway.

Thanks for your input. I did not feel these are worth a larger discussion, but looking at your review what I committed indeed required a discussion. I will revert and push things to phab.

Best,
Tobias


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list