[PATCH] D43920: Set DF_TEXTREL instead of creating an empty DT_TEXTREL.
Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 1 14:35:10 PST 2018
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:34 PM Rafael Avila de Espindola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rafael Avila de Espindola <
> > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Sigh, looks like DF_TEXTREL is also missing from musl.
> >> Maybe we could decide on DF_TEXTREL or DT_TEXTREL based on
> >> -enable-new-dtags?
> > Hmm, I could, but I'd just do both then for the sake of simplicity.
> Having it based on -enable-new-dtags would be a way of putting some
> pressure to move to the new flag.
I'd agree -- and we can make --enable-new-dtags default.
> In any case, I am OK with having both.
> Taking a look at the implementation proper.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-commits