[llvm] r319807 - [CVP] Remove some {s|u}sub.with.overflow checks.

[Joel Galenson via llvm-commits]

Author: jgalenson
Date: Tue Dec  5 10:14:24 2017
New Revision: 319807

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=319807&view=rev
Log:
[CVP] Remove some {s|u}sub.with.overflow checks.

This uses ConstantRange::makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion's newly-added handling for subtraction to allow CVP to remove some subtraction overflow checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40039

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/overflows.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp?rev=319807&r1=319806&r2=319807&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp Tue Dec  5 10:14:24 2017
@@ -329,13 +329,15 @@ static bool processSwitch(SwitchInst *SI
 // See if we can prove that the given overflow intrinsic will not overflow.
 static bool willNotOverflow(IntrinsicInst *II, LazyValueInfo *LVI) {
   using OBO = OverflowingBinaryOperator;
-  auto NoWrapOnAddition = [&] (Value *LHS, Value *RHS, unsigned NoWrapKind) {
+  auto NoWrap = [&] (Instruction::BinaryOps BinOp, unsigned NoWrapKind) {
+    Value *RHS = II->getOperand(1);
     ConstantRange RRange = LVI->getConstantRange(RHS, II->getParent(), II);
     ConstantRange NWRegion = ConstantRange::makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion(
-        BinaryOperator::Add, RRange, NoWrapKind);
+        BinOp, RRange, NoWrapKind);
     // As an optimization, do not compute LRange if we do not need it.
     if (NWRegion.isEmptySet())
       return false;
+    Value *LHS = II->getOperand(0);
     ConstantRange LRange = LVI->getConstantRange(LHS, II->getParent(), II);
     return NWRegion.contains(LRange);
   };
@@ -343,11 +345,13 @@ static bool willNotOverflow(IntrinsicIns
   default:
     break;
   case Intrinsic::uadd_with_overflow:
-    return NoWrapOnAddition(II->getOperand(0), II->getOperand(1),
-                            OBO::NoUnsignedWrap);
+    return NoWrap(Instruction::Add, OBO::NoUnsignedWrap);
   case Intrinsic::sadd_with_overflow:
-    return NoWrapOnAddition(II->getOperand(0), II->getOperand(1),
-                            OBO::NoSignedWrap);
+    return NoWrap(Instruction::Add, OBO::NoSignedWrap);
+  case Intrinsic::usub_with_overflow:
+    return NoWrap(Instruction::Sub, OBO::NoUnsignedWrap);
+  case Intrinsic::ssub_with_overflow:
+    return NoWrap(Instruction::Sub, OBO::NoSignedWrap);
   }
   return false;
 }
@@ -356,12 +360,17 @@ static void processOverflowIntrinsic(Int
   Value *NewOp = nullptr;
   switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
   default:
-    llvm_unreachable("Illegal instruction.");
+    llvm_unreachable("Unexpected instruction.");
   case Intrinsic::uadd_with_overflow:
   case Intrinsic::sadd_with_overflow:
     NewOp = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(II->getOperand(0), II->getOperand(1),
                                       II->getName(), II);
     break;
+  case Intrinsic::usub_with_overflow:
+  case Intrinsic::ssub_with_overflow:
+    NewOp = BinaryOperator::CreateSub(II->getOperand(0), II->getOperand(1),
+                                      II->getName(), II);
+    break;
   }
   ++NumOverflows;
   IRBuilder<> B(II);
@@ -376,7 +385,7 @@ static bool processCallSite(CallSite CS,
   SmallVector<unsigned, 4> ArgNos;
   unsigned ArgNo = 0;
 
-  if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(CS.getInstruction())) {
+  if (auto *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(CS.getInstruction())) {
     if (willNotOverflow(II, LVI)) {
       processOverflowIntrinsic(II);
       return true;

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/overflows.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/overflows.ll?rev=319807&r1=319806&r2=319807&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/overflows.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/overflows.ll Tue Dec  5 10:14:24 2017
@@ -13,8 +13,7 @@ declare void @llvm.trap()
 
 define i32 @signed_add(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @signed_add(
-; CHECK: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
-; CHECK: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
+; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
 ; CHECK: @llvm.sadd.with.overflow.i32
 entry:
   %cmp = icmp sgt i32 %y, 0
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ cond.end:
 
 define i32 @unsigned_add(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @unsigned_add(
-; CHECK: @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32
+; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32
 ; CHECK: @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i32
 entry:
   %0 = tail call { i32, i1 } @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32(i32 -1, i32 %y)
@@ -203,7 +202,7 @@ cond.end:
 
 define i32 @signed_sub_r1(i32 %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @signed_sub_r1(
-; CHECK: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
+; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
 entry:
   %cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, -2147483648
   br i1 %cmp, label %cond.end, label %cond.false
@@ -225,7 +224,7 @@ cond.end:
 
 define i32 @unsigned_sub_r1(i32 %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @unsigned_sub_r1(
-; CHECK: @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32
+; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32
 entry:
   %cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
   br i1 %cmp, label %cond.end, label %cond.false
@@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ cond.end:
 
 define i32 @signed_sub_rn1(i32 %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @signed_sub_rn1(
-; CHECK: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
+; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.ssub.with.overflow.i32
 entry:
   %cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 2147483647
   br i1 %cmp, label %cond.end, label %cond.false
@@ -293,7 +292,7 @@ declare i32 @bar(i32)
 
 define void @unsigned_loop(i32 %i) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @unsigned_loop(
-; CHECK: @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32
+; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.usub.with.overflow.i32
 entry:
   %cmp3 = icmp eq i32 %i, 0
   br i1 %cmp3, label %while.end, label %while.body.preheader