[lld] r316811 - Inline trivial symbol constructors.

[Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits]

They are now written in class declarations, so they are inlined, no?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> writes:
>
> > Author: ruiu
> > Date: Fri Oct 27 16:26:46 2017
> > New Revision: 316811
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=316811&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Inline trivial symbol constructors.
>
>
> Is "Inline" the right word? They were not inlined, they were moved to a
> header.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20171028/267a1ebb/attachment.html>