[docs] Minor wording nit in FuzzingLLVM.rst

[Justin Bogner via llvm-commits]

Vedant Kumar via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> Hey Justin,
>
> Thanks for adding more fuzzing docs!
>
> I had a small wording nit:

That sentence really got away from me there. I've applied your
suggestion in r315676. Thanks for looking at this!

> diff --git a/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst b/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst
> index 138c655a962..5ac0ff8d519 100644
> --- a/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst
> +++ b/docs/FuzzingLLVM.rst
> @@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ Configuring LLVM to Build Fuzzers
>  
>  Fuzzers will be built and linked to libFuzzer by default as long as you build
>  LLVM with sanitizer coverage enabled. You would typically also enable at least
> -one sanitizer for the fuzzers to be particularly likely, so the most common way
> -to build the fuzzers is by adding the following two flags to your CMake
> -invocation: ``-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=On``.
> +one sanitizer to find bugs faster. The most common way to build the fuzzers is
> +by adding the following two flags to your CMake invocation:
> +``-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE=On``.
>  
>  .. note:: If you have ``compiler-rt`` checked out in an LLVM tree when building
>            with sanitizers, you'll want to specify ``-DLLVM_BUILD_RUNTIME=Off``
>
>
>
> vedant
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits