[PATCH] D38018: Handle profile mismatch correctly for SamplePGO.

[Dehao Chen via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

danielcdh updated this revision to Diff 115866.
danielcdh added a comment.

update


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38018

Files:
  lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
  test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/indirect-call.prof
  test/Transforms/SampleProfile/indirect-call.ll


Index: test/Transforms/SampleProfile/indirect-call.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/SampleProfile/indirect-call.ll
+++ test/Transforms/SampleProfile/indirect-call.ll
@@ -69,6 +69,19 @@
   ret void
 }
 
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_noinline_bitcast
+; If the indirect call has been promoted to a direct call with bitcast,
+; do not inline it.
+define float @test_noinline_bitcast(float ()*) !dbg !26 {
+  %2 = alloca float ()*
+  store float ()* %0, float ()** %2
+; CHECK: icmp
+; CHECK: call
+  %3 = load float ()*, float ()** %2
+  %4 = call float %3(), !dbg !27
+  ret float %4
+}
+
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_norecursive_inline
 ; If the indirect call target is the caller, we should not promote it.
 define void @test_norecursive_inline() !dbg !24 {
@@ -114,6 +127,10 @@
   ret void
 }
 
+define i32 @foo_direct_i32() !dbg !28 {
+  ret i32 0;
+}
+
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_direct
 ; We should not promote a direct call.
 define void @test_direct() !dbg !22 {
@@ -155,3 +172,6 @@
 !23 = !DILocation(line: 23, scope: !22)
 !24 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_norecursive_inline", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 12, unit: !0)
 !25 = !DILocation(line: 13, scope: !24)
+!26 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test_noinline_bitcast", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 12, unit: !0)
+!27 = !DILocation(line: 13, scope: !26)
+!28 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo_direct_i32", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 11, unit: !0)
Index: test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/indirect-call.prof
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/indirect-call.prof
+++ test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/indirect-call.prof
@@ -20,3 +20,6 @@
 test_norecursive_inline:3000:0
  1: test_norecursive_inline:3000
   20: 3000
+test_noinline_bitcast:3000:0
+ 1: foo_direct_i32:3000
+  1: 3000
Index: lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@
         continue;
       Instruction *DI = I;
       if (!CalledFunction && !PromotedInsns.count(I) &&
-          CallSite(I).isIndirectCall())
+          CallSite(I).isIndirectCall()) {
         for (const auto *FS : findIndirectCallFunctionSamples(*I)) {
           auto CalleeFunctionName = FS->getName();
           // If it is a recursive call, we do not inline it as it could bloat
@@ -751,12 +751,17 @@
             continue;
           }
         }
+        // If there is profile mismatch, we should not attempt to inline DI.
+        if (!isa<CallInst>(DI) && !isa<InvokeInst>(DI))
+          continue;
+      }
       if (!CalledFunction || !CalledFunction->getSubprogram()) {
         findCalleeFunctionSamples(*I)->findImportedFunctions(
             ImportGUIDs, F.getParent(),
             Samples->getTotalSamples() * SampleProfileHotThreshold / 100);
         continue;
       }
+      assert(isa<CallInst>(DI) || isa<InvokeInst>(DI));
       CallSite CS(DI);
       DebugLoc DLoc = I->getDebugLoc();
       BasicBlock *BB = I->getParent();


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D38018.115866.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3137 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170919/f79ed874/attachment.bin>