[PATCH] D37893: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128

[Phabricator via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL313373: [X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones… (authored by ctopper).

Changed prior to commit:
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D37893?vs=115423&id=115430#toc

Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D37893

Files:
  llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
  llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/avx-vperm2x128.ll
  llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-shuffles/partial_permute.ll
  llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vector-shuffle-256-v8.ll

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D37893.115430.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 10121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170915/750238bd/attachment.bin>