[PATCH] D37153: [LoopUnroll] Properly update loop structure in case of successful peeling

[Michael Zolotukhin via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mzolotukhin added a comment.

> I added a cl::opt...

You seemed to forget to use it in the test though :)

I would also give basic blocks and variables more meaningful names (specifically, I'd rename header and preheader blocks to show clearer, what happens in the test).

Michael



================
Comment at: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr33437.ll:2
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -loop-unroll %s -S | FileCheck %s
+
----------------
Won't `opt %s -S` overwrite the input file with the output?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D37153