[PATCH] D36897: [WIP!][Dominators] Add a tool for benchmarking the incremental updater

[Jakub Kuderski via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

kuhar added a comment.

To make it more clear, the simplest dynamic scheduling that I'd expect to work somewhat reasonably would be to look ahead on the next N updates in the update sequence, and greedily pick the one that us lowest in the tree. (And N could be `min(UpdatesLeft, SmallConstant = 64)`).


https://reviews.llvm.org/D36897