[PATCH] D36018: Make .file directive to have basename only

[Taewook Oh via llvm-commits]

Ah okay. Thanks!

On 8/9/17, 8:59 PM, "Rafael Avila de Espindola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

    It is not necessary, just a LGTM on the list is OK.
    
    Cheers,
    Rafael
    
    Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com> writes:
    
    > Thanks for the review. Could you please accept it from phabricator as well? Thanks!
    >
    > Best,
    > Taewook
    >
    > From: Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>
    > Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 6:27 PM
    > To: Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>
    > Cc: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>, "reviews+D36018+public+24bc47bb4db179c8 at reviews.llvm.org" <reviews+D36018+public+24bc47bb4db179c8 at reviews.llvm.org>, Taewook Oh via Phabricator <reviews at reviews.llvm.org>, Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com>, llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
    > Subject: Re: [PATCH] D36018: Make .file directive to have basename only
    >
    > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com<mailto:rafael.espindola at gmail.com>> wrote:
    > Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk<mailto:peter at pcc.me.uk>> writes:
    >
    >> ThinLTO uses the source filename to compute GUIDs for globals, so this
    >> change will increase the likelihood of GUID collisions.
    >
    > Note that this change only the asm printer. Is that the code path that
    > is used for computing GUID?
    >
    > Apologies, I misunderstood your earlier mail and didn't look at the change itself. The GUID computation is done elsewhere.
    >
    > This change LGTM.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > --
    > --
    > Peter