[PATCH] D21723: [RFC] Enhance synchscope representation

[Mehdi AMINI via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added inline comments.


================
Comment at: docs/LangRef.rst:2193
+the seq\_cst total orderings of, other atomic operations marked
+``syncscope("<a>")`` that are members of the same instance of scope ``<a>``.
+
----------------
`scope instance` aren't defined.
And I don't even see why bringing this here. Unless there is a generic and relevant IR definition of `scope instance`, what matters is just that the target can say yes/no/maybe.



https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723