[llvm] r303497 - [SCEV] Clarify behavior around max backedge taken count

Vitaly Buka via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat May 20 21:49:37 PDT 2017


http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/1379/steps/check-llvm%20check-clang%20stage3%2Fmsan/logs/stdio

FAILED: tools/llvm-xray/CMakeFiles/llvm-xray.dir/xray-color-helper.cc.o
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/clang++
  -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DLLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
-Itools/llvm-xray
-I/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/llvm-xray
-Iinclude -I/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include
-fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -Wall
-W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
-Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wcovered-switch-default -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor
-Wstring-conversion -fcolor-diagnostics -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -O3    -UNDEBUG  -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -MD -MT
tools/llvm-xray/CMakeFiles/llvm-xray.dir/xray-color-helper.cc.o -MF
tools/llvm-xray/CMakeFiles/llvm-xray.dir/xray-color-helper.cc.o.d -o
tools/llvm-xray/CMakeFiles/llvm-xray.dir/xray-color-helper.cc.o -c
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/llvm-xray/xray-color-helper.cc
==969==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x3533258 in
llvm::X86InstrInfo::AnalyzeBranchImpl(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&,
llvm::MachineBasicBlock*&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*&,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineOperand>&,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineInstr*>&, bool) const
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp:6093:22
    #1 0x353333d in
llvm::X86InstrInfo::analyzeBranch(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&,
llvm::MachineBasicBlock*&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*&,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineOperand>&, bool) const
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp:6133:10
    #2 0x42fddcc in llvm::TailDuplicator::tailDuplicate(bool,
llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>&,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineInstr*>&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplicator.cpp:837:10
    #3 0x42fab3a in llvm::TailDuplicator::tailDuplicateAndUpdate(bool,
llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>*,
llvm::function_ref<void (llvm::MachineBasicBlock*)>*)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplicator.cpp:148:8
   #4 0x44e921b in (anonymous
namespace)::MachineBlockPlacement::maybeTailDuplicateBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*,
llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, (anonymous namespace)::BlockChain&,
llvm::SmallSetVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock const*, 16u>*,
llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::MachineBasicBlock,
true, false, void>, false, false>&, bool&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp:2620:11
    #5 0x44cef5d in repeatedlyTailDuplicateBlock
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp:2501:13
    #6 0x44cef5d in (anonymous
namespace)::MachineBlockPlacement::buildChain(llvm::MachineBasicBlock
const*, (anonymous namespace)::BlockChain&,
llvm::SmallSetVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock const*, 16u>*)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp:1699
    #7 0x44b6970 in (anonymous
namespace)::MachineBlockPlacement::buildCFGChains()
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp:2278:3
    #8 0x44b14a9 in (anonymous
namespace)::MachineBlockPlacement::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBlockPlacement.cpp:2696:3
    #9 0x3f6dcac in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:62:13
    #10 0x48e2bee in
llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1519:27
    #11 0x48e32b4 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1540:16
    #12 0x48e45d3 in runOnModule
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1596:27
    #13 0x48e45d3 in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1699
    #14 0x5d3e27e in EmitAssembly
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:792:19
    #15 0x5d3e27e in
clang::EmitBackendOutput(clang::DiagnosticsEngine&,
clang::HeaderSearchOptions const&, clang::CodeGenOptions const&,
clang::TargetOptions const&, clang::LangOptions const&,
llvm::DataLayout const&, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction,
std::__1::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream,
std::__1::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream> >)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:1101
    #16 0x74dfefe in
clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp:258:7
    #17 0x848e176 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:159:13
    #18 0x69f82ba in clang::FrontendAction::Execute()
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:837:8
    #19 0x693a02c in
clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:970:11
    #20 0x6bc3705 in
clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*)
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:249:25
    #21 0x976e25 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*,
void*) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:221:13
    #22 0x970ce7 in ExecuteCC1Tool
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:299:12
    #23 0x970ce7 in main
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:380
    #24 0x7f561ec5c82f in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2082f)
    #25 0x8f0d38 in _start
(/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/clang-5.0+0x8f0d38)


On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Author: sanjoy
> Date: Sat May 20 20:47:50 2017
> New Revision: 303497
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=303497&view=rev
> Log:
> [SCEV] Clarify behavior around max backedge taken count
>
> This change makes the split between the "exact" backedge taken count
> and the "maximum" backedge taken count a bit more obvious.  Both of
> these are upper bounds on the number of times the loop header
> executes (since SCEV does not account for most kinds of abnormal
> control flow), but the latter is guaranteed to be a constant.
>
> There were a few places where the max backedge taken count *was* a
> non-constant; I've changed those to compute constants instead.
>
> At this point, I'm not sure if the constant max backedge count can be
> computed by calling `getUnsignedRange(Exact).getUnsignedMax()` without
> losing precision.  If it can, we can simplify even further by making
> `getMaxBackedgeTakenCount` a thin wrapper around
> `getBackedgeTakenCount` and `getUnsignedRange`.
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
>     llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
>     llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll
>     llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count-pow2.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/
> llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h?rev=303497&r1=303496&r2=303497&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h Sat May 20
> 20:47:50 2017
> @@ -656,10 +656,12 @@ private:
>      /// Test whether this BackedgeTakenInfo contains complete information.
>      bool hasFullInfo() const { return isComplete(); }
>
> -    /// Return an expression indicating the exact backedge-taken count of
> the
> -    /// loop if it is known or SCEVCouldNotCompute otherwise. This is the
> -    /// number of times the loop header can be guaranteed to execute,
> minus
> -    /// one.
> +    /// Return an expression indicating the exact *backedge-taken*
> +    /// count of the loop if it is known or SCEVCouldNotCompute
> +    /// otherwise.  If execution makes it to the backedge on every
> +    /// iteration (i.e. there are no abnormal exists like exception
> +    /// throws and thread exits) then this is the number of times the
> +    /// loop header will execute minus one.
>      ///
>      /// If the SCEV predicate associated with the answer can be different
>      /// from AlwaysTrue, we must add a (non null) Predicates argument.
> @@ -1398,11 +1400,11 @@ public:
>    const SCEV *getExitCount(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBlock);
>
>    /// If the specified loop has a predictable backedge-taken count,
> return it,
> -  /// otherwise return a SCEVCouldNotCompute object. The backedge-taken
> count
> -  /// is the number of times the loop header will be branched to from
> within
> -  /// the loop. This is one less than the trip count of the loop, since it
> -  /// doesn't count the first iteration, when the header is branched to
> from
> -  /// outside the loop.
> +  /// otherwise return a SCEVCouldNotCompute object. The backedge-taken
> count is
> +  /// the number of times the loop header will be branched to from within
> the
> +  /// loop, assuming there are no abnormal exists like exception throws.
> This is
> +  /// one less than the trip count of the loop, since it doesn't count
> the first
> +  /// iteration, when the header is branched to from outside the loop.
>    ///
>    /// Note that it is not valid to call this method on a loop without a
>    /// loop-invariant backedge-taken count (see
> @@ -1417,8 +1419,10 @@ public:
>    const SCEV *getPredicatedBackedgeTakenCount(const Loop *L,
>                                                SCEVUnionPredicate
> &Predicates);
>
> -  /// Similar to getBackedgeTakenCount, except return the least SCEV value
> -  /// that is known never to be less than the actual backedge taken count.
> +  /// When successful, this returns a SCEVConstant that is greater than
> or equal
> +  /// to (i.e. a "conservative over-approximation") of the value returend
> by
> +  /// getBackedgeTakenCount.  If such a value cannot be computed, it
> returns the
> +  /// SCEVCouldNotCompute object.
>    const SCEV *getMaxBackedgeTakenCount(const Loop *L);
>
>    /// Return true if the backedge taken count is either the value
> returned by
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/
> Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=303497&r1=303496&r2=303497&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Sat May 20 20:47:50 2017
> @@ -5947,6 +5947,8 @@ ScalarEvolution::BackedgeTakenInfo::getM
>    if (any_of(ExitNotTaken, PredicateNotAlwaysTrue) || !getMax())
>      return SE->getCouldNotCompute();
>
> +  assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(getMax()) ||
> isa<SCEVConstant>(getMax())) &&
> +         "No point in having a non-constant max backedge taken count!");
>    return getMax();
>  }
>
> @@ -5972,7 +5974,11 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::BackedgeTakenInfo:
>  }
>
>  ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit::ExitLimit(const SCEV *E)
> -    : ExactNotTaken(E), MaxNotTaken(E), MaxOrZero(false) {}
> +    : ExactNotTaken(E), MaxNotTaken(E), MaxOrZero(false) {
> +  assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxNotTaken) ||
> +          isa<SCEVConstant>(MaxNotTaken)) &&
> +         "No point in having a non-constant max backedge taken count!");
> +}
>
>  ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit::ExitLimit(
>      const SCEV *E, const SCEV *M, bool MaxOrZero,
> @@ -5981,6 +5987,9 @@ ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit::ExitLimit(
>    assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExactNotTaken) ||
>            !isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxNotTaken)) &&
>           "Exact is not allowed to be less precise than Max");
> +  assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxNotTaken) ||
> +          isa<SCEVConstant>(MaxNotTaken)) &&
> +         "No point in having a non-constant max backedge taken count!");
>    for (auto *PredSet : PredSetList)
>      for (auto *P : *PredSet)
>        addPredicate(P);
> @@ -5989,11 +5998,19 @@ ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit::ExitLimit(
>  ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit::ExitLimit(
>      const SCEV *E, const SCEV *M, bool MaxOrZero,
>      const SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEVPredicate *> &PredSet)
> -    : ExitLimit(E, M, MaxOrZero, {&PredSet}) {}
> +    : ExitLimit(E, M, MaxOrZero, {&PredSet}) {
> +  assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxNotTaken) ||
> +          isa<SCEVConstant>(MaxNotTaken)) &&
> +         "No point in having a non-constant max backedge taken count!");
> +}
>
>  ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit::ExitLimit(const SCEV *E, const SCEV *M,
>                                        bool MaxOrZero)
> -    : ExitLimit(E, M, MaxOrZero, None) {}
> +    : ExitLimit(E, M, MaxOrZero, None) {
> +  assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxNotTaken) ||
> +          isa<SCEVConstant>(MaxNotTaken)) &&
> +         "No point in having a non-constant max backedge taken count!");
> +}
>
>  /// Allocate memory for BackedgeTakenInfo and copy the not-taken count of
> each
>  /// computable exit into a persistent ExitNotTakenInfo array.
> @@ -6018,6 +6035,8 @@ ScalarEvolution::BackedgeTakenInfo::Back
>
>          return ExitNotTakenInfo(ExitBB, EL.ExactNotTaken,
> std::move(Predicate));
>        });
> +  assert((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxCount) ||
> isa<SCEVConstant>(MaxCount)) &&
> +         "No point in having a non-constant max backedge taken count!");
>  }
>
>  /// Invalidate this result and free the ExitNotTakenInfo array.
> @@ -6279,7 +6298,7 @@ ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit ScalarEvoluti
>        // to not.
>        if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxBECount) &&
>            !isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BECount))
> -        MaxBECount = BECount;
> +        MaxBECount = getConstant(getUnsignedRange(
> BECount).getUnsignedMax());
>
>        return ExitLimit(BECount, MaxBECount, false,
>                         {&EL0.Predicates, &EL1.Predicates});
> @@ -7583,13 +7602,20 @@ ScalarEvolution::howFarToZero(const SCEV
>        loopHasNoAbnormalExits(AddRec->getLoop())) {
>      const SCEV *Exact =
>          getUDivExpr(Distance, CountDown ? getNegativeSCEV(Step) : Step);
> -    return ExitLimit(Exact, Exact, false, Predicates);
> +    const SCEV *Max =
> +        Exact == getCouldNotCompute()
> +            ? Exact
> +            : getConstant(getUnsignedRange(Exact).getUnsignedMax());
> +    return ExitLimit(Exact, Max, false, Predicates);
>    }
>
>    // Solve the general equation.
> -  const SCEV *E = SolveLinEquationWithOverflow(
> -      StepC->getAPInt(), getNegativeSCEV(Start), *this);
> -  return ExitLimit(E, E, false, Predicates);
> +  const SCEV *E = SolveLinEquationWithOverflow(StepC->getAPInt(),
> +                                               getNegativeSCEV(Start),
> *this);
> +  const SCEV *M = E == getCouldNotCompute()
> +                      ? E
> +                      : getConstant(getUnsignedRange(
> E).getUnsignedMax());
> +  return ExitLimit(E, M, false, Predicates);
>  }
>
>  ScalarEvolution::ExitLimit
> @@ -9218,8 +9244,9 @@ ScalarEvolution::howManyLessThans(const
>                                  getConstant(StrideForMaxBECount), false);
>    }
>
> -  if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxBECount))
> -    MaxBECount = BECount;
> +  if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxBECount) &&
> +      !isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BECount))
> +    MaxBECount = getConstant(getUnsignedRange(BECount).getUnsignedMax());
>
>    return ExitLimit(BECount, MaxBECount, MaxOrZero, Predicates);
>  }
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/
> Analysis/ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll?rev=303497&r1=303496&r2=303497&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll Sat May 20 20:47:50
> 2017
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ for.body.i.i:
>    %cmp.i.i = icmp eq i32* %ptrincdec.i.i, %end
>    br i1 %cmp.i.i, label %_ZSt4fillIPiiEvT_S1_RKT0_.exit, label
> %for.body.i.i
>  ; CHECK: Loop %for.body.i.i: backedge-taken count is ((-4 + (-1 * %begin)
> + %end) /u 4)
> -; CHECK: Loop %for.body.i.i: max backedge-taken count is ((-4 + (-1 *
> %begin) + %end) /u 4)
> +; CHECK: Loop %for.body.i.i: max backedge-taken count is
> 4611686018427387903
>  _ZSt4fillIPiiEvT_S1_RKT0_.exit:                   ; preds =
> %for.body.i.i, %entry
>    ret void
>  }
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count-pow2.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/
> Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count-pow2.ll?rev=303497&r1=
> 303496&r2=303497&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count-pow2.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count-pow2.ll Sat May
> 20 20:47:50 2017
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ exit:
>
>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @test1
>  ; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-32 + (96 * %n)) /u 32)
> -; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is ((-32 + (96 * %n)) /u 32)
> +; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 134217727
>  }
>
>  ; PR19183
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ exit:
>
>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
>  ; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-32 + (32 * (%n /u 32)))
> /u 32)
> -; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is ((-32 + (32 * (%n /u
> 32))) /u 32)
> +; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 134217727
>  }
>
>  define void @test3(i32 %n) {
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ exit:
>
>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @test3
>  ; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-32 + (32 * %n)) /u 32)
> -; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is ((-32 + (32 * %n)) /u 32)
> +; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 134217727
>  }
>
>  define void @test4(i32 %n) {
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ exit:
>
>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @test4
>  ; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-4 + (-1431655764 * %n))
> /u 4)
> -; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is ((-4 + (-1431655764 *
> %n)) /u 4)
> +; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 1073741823
>  }
>
>  define void @test5(i32 %n) {
> @@ -83,5 +83,5 @@ exit:
>
>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @test5
>  ; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is ((-4 + (4 * %n)) /u 4)
> -; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is ((-4 + (4 * %n)) /u 4)
> +; CHECK: Loop %loop: max backedge-taken count is 1073741823
>  }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170520/644e2ccb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list