[PATCH] D20116: Add speculatable function attribute

[Sanjoy Das via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

sanjoy added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D20116#708238, @sanjoy wrote:

> It //may// be possible to come up with a consistent model of this new thing, but I think the model will still be tricky to work with.


This ^ ended up sounding more FUD'dy than I intended.  What I meant to say is that I'm being cautious because this isn't obviously okay, not because this is obviously not okay.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D20116