[PATCH] D30444: Rename isKnownNotFullPoison to programUndefinedIfPoison; NFC

Sanjoy Das via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 27 22:55:28 PST 2017


sanjoy created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: mzolotukhin, mcrosier.

programUndefinedIfPoison makes more sense, given what the function
does; and I'm about to add a function with a name similar to
isKnownNotFullPoison (so do the rename to avoid confusion).


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30444

Files:
  include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
  lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
  lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
  lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
  test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll


Index: test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
+++ test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
   ret void
 }
 
-; Demonstrate why we need a Visited set in llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison.
+; Demonstrate why we need a Visited set in llvm::programUndefinedIfPoison.
 define void @test-add-not-header5(float* %input, i32 %offset) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-not-header5
 entry:
Index: lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@
   // Add I to DominatingExprs if it's an add/sub that can't sign overflow.
   if (match(I, m_NSWAdd(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS))) ||
       match(I, m_NSWSub(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS)))) {
-    if (isKnownNotFullPoison(I)) {
+    if (programUndefinedIfPoison(I)) {
       const SCEV *Key =
           SE->getAddExpr(SE->getUnknown(LHS), SE->getUnknown(RHS));
       DominatingExprs[Key].push_back(I);
Index: lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -3902,7 +3902,7 @@
   }
 }
 
-bool llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI) {
+bool llvm::programUndefinedIfPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI) {
   // We currently only look for uses of poison values within the same basic
   // block, as that makes it easier to guarantee that the uses will be
   // executed given that PoisonI is executed.
Index: lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -4915,7 +4915,8 @@
     return false;
 
   // Only proceed if we can prove that I does not yield poison.
-  if (!isKnownNotFullPoison(I)) return false;
+  if (!programUndefinedIfPoison(I))
+    return false;
 
   // At this point we know that if I is executed, then it does not wrap
   // according to at least one of NSW or NUW. If I is not executed, then we do
Index: include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
===================================================================
--- include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
+++ include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@
   ///
   /// Note that this currently only considers the basic block that is
   /// the parent of I.
-  bool isKnownNotFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI);
+  bool programUndefinedIfPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI);
 
   /// Starting with the assumption that \p I is not poison, fill \p
   /// NonPoison with a set of values that are also known to not be


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D30444.89977.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2858 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20170228/2d566ac7/attachment.bin>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list