[PATCH] D28159: [ARM] Fix test CodeGen/ARM/fpcmp_ueq.ll broken by rL290616

[Renato Golin via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

rengolin added a comment.

The original test was really bad, the current state is better, but I agree, those check lines make no attempt to understand the test.

I think this patch is better in that respect, but I want to understand a bit more. Why do you omit the function names in the `bl` check? Do they change? Should they?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28159