[PATCH] D28401: Handle versioned undefined symbols

[Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-commits]

Peter Collingbourne via Phabricator <reviews at reviews.llvm.org> writes:

> pcc accepted this revision.
> pcc added a comment.
> This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
>
> LGTM
>
> Since I've been thinking about copy relocations recently: I wonder whether there's anything we need to/can do about copy relocations with this change? It isn't possible to preempt a specific version of a symbol in another DSO, is it?

Good question. I have no idea if the dynamic linker handles that. I will
try to write a test.

Cheers,
Rafael