[PATCH] D27518: Moving isComplex decision to TTI

[Mohammed Agabaria via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

magabari added a comment.

So you are suggesting passing the SCEV of the ptr instead of the Step, right?

I am just trying to think if there is more interesting access patterns rather than strided access to care about,
which is already covered by passing the step and isStrided boolean.
Also in this case I need to pass the ScalarEvolution ptr in order to get the Step.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D27518