[PATCH] D27709: [LLD][ARM] Add support for thunks to undefined non-weak symbols

Rui Ueyama via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 13 16:35:35 PST 2016

ruiu added a comment.

The concept of "undefined symbols with thunks" doesn't click in my mind. It feels like a null pointer but with some data. Can we handle such undefined symbols as a different type? For example, what if we promote (or replace) undefined symbols with shared symbols (or defined symbols) after we resolve all symbols if we are creating an DSO?


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list