[PATCH] D27709: [LLD][ARM] Add support for thunks to undefined non-weak symbols

Rui Ueyama via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 13 16:35:35 PST 2016


ruiu added a comment.

The concept of "undefined symbols with thunks" doesn't click in my mind. It feels like a null pointer but with some data. Can we handle such undefined symbols as a different type? For example, what if we promote (or replace) undefined symbols with shared symbols (or defined symbols) after we resolve all symbols if we are creating an DSO?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D27709





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list