[PATCH] D26743: Expandload and Compressing store - documentation update

[Adam Nemet via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

anemet added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26743#616109, @mkuper wrote:

> Hal, Adam, does this seem sensible to you too?


My preference would be to wait for the outcome of the result of the working group on vectorization idioms.  This is not the only idiom that requires control-flow so there may be some common mechanism developed and as a result this would have to be completely redone/autoupgraded, etc.

But if you and Hal feel strongly about this I won't stand in the way.

Adam


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D26743