Embedded Bitcode in Object Files

[Nico Weber via llvm-commits]

It looks like patches 1 and  2 made it but 3 and 4 didn't. Do you no longer
need them?

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Steven Wu via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Ping. I don't know who is the best review for the patches. Thanks for
> Rafael looking at the LLVM change. Richard, do you have any opinions on the
> clang changes?
>
> Thanks
>
> Steven
>
> > On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > I put up some patches for embedding bitcode inside the object file
> (-fembed-bitcode) option. As I described in the dev list before, the new
> option can create normal object file with bitcode embedded in a special
> section. You can easily recreate the same object file with the embedded
> bitcode in it.
> >
> > I split the patch into several parts:
> > llvm patch:
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17388: Introduce the section for embedding
> bitcode in MachO file.
> >
> > There are four clang patches:
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17390: Implementing the clang driver for the
> new option.
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17392: Teach clang how to embed bitcode into
> the object file.
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17393: Slightly tweak the bitcode emitted in
> embed bitcode stage 1.
> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394: Reduce the amount of option gets
> embedded in the bitcode by introducing a whitelist and a blacklist.
> >
> > Let me know if anyone is interested in helping reviewing these changes.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Steven
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20161129/776b36a7/attachment.html>