[PATCH] D25478: Do not remove implicit defs in BranchFolder

Matthias Braun via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 12 12:56:17 PDT 2016


MatzeB accepted this revision.
MatzeB added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25478#568330, @kparzysz wrote:

> I looked at the actual differences:
>
> z23.s: one small block is located in a different place.  It's not on a fall-through (either in or out) path in either case.
>  z37.s: block numbering differences, no codegen differences
>  z44.s: same as z37.s, i.e. no codegen differences


Sounds good to me.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D25478





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list