[PATCH] D25379: ThinLTO: don't perform incremental LTO on module without a hash

Fri Oct 7 17:20:35 PDT 2016

tejohnson added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379#565121, @tejohnson wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379#565109, @mehdi_amini wrote:
>
> > It is conceptually independent and could go in now, but yes I'll wait for the other one so that I don't have to fix the conflict.
>
>
> I don't have the other approach started yet, and this is needed to be able to fix the bug fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D25300.

Nevermind, wrong patch! That's what happens when I try to review on my phone...

https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379